Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 09:59
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
U.S. Home Sellers Are Sitting on Nearly $700 Billion Worth of Listings, an All-Time High - Redfin
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What could a Google ‘Pixel Flip’ do better than the Motorola Razr? - 9to5Google
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Cannabis use in any form directly linked to significant risk of heart damage - Earth.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Do married men know when their wives are having affairs?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Scientists May Have Just Discovered the First Ever Pieces of Mercury - The Daily Galaxy
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Humans Age Faster at 2 Specific Times in Their Life, Study Finds - ScienceAlert